Abstract

This book introduces the reader to the concepts, research, and empirical findings associated with groups. Group Dynamics is more like a basecoat than a detailed handbook, taking samples of the outcomes of research activities into the essence of groups. However, still, it tries to incorporate theory and research, basic science and application, masterpiece and contemporary work, and psychological and sociological assessments of groups whenever possible. But why would anybody want to learn in a group in the first place? Why will you be concerned about the processes in active, dynamic groups? What makes them attractive? For what reasons is it essential to investigate theories that characterise these processes? Why is it necessary to keep expanding these assumptions to encompass more and more knowledge about groups? For the simple reason that groupings are significant. On a practical level, groups do most of the world’s labour; consequently, knowing them will aid us in increasing their productivity. If we want to improve factory output, boardroom problem solving, or classroom learning, we must first understand groups and how they function. Racism, sexism, and international conflict are all societal concerns that may be resolved via the efforts of a group of people. Any attempt to transform society will be successful only if the groups that make up the social change as well. Individuals must be understood to comprehend why they think, feel, and act the way they do, which involves the usage of groups Since human behaviour is primarily a collective activity, people cannot be studied in isolation, away from their families, social cliques, workgroups, etc. It is impossible to communicate directly with individuals about traditions, values, and norms; instead, they operate via the communities to which everyone belongs. Groups are also significant because of the features that make them unique. You’ll spend the rest of your life in groups, trying to get out of them, leading them, and transforming them into something better. Being a part of a group allows you to establish and confirm your beliefs and views, and it also allows you to take on or develop a social identity. When presented with unfamiliar circumstances, being in a group gives reassuring information about your problems and the group’s security as a collective. You will learn about interpersonal interactions, the kind of impressions you make on others, and how to better engage with people while working in groups with your classmates. Groups have a significant effect on your life; consequently, you should not ignore their influence at your own expense.

Keywords:

Group, Group dynamics, Reinforcement Strategies

 

References

Bion, W. R. (2018). Group dynamics: A re-view. In New directions in psycho-analysis (pp. 440-477). Routledge.

Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1961). Group dynamics: Key to decision making.

Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., De Schutter, B., & Ernst, D. (2017). Reinforcement learning and dynamic programming using function approximators. CRC press.

Cole, M. B. (2005). Group dynamics in occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Conger, J. J. (1956). II. Reinforcement theory and the dynamics of alcoholism. Quarterly journal of studies on alcohol, 17(2), 296-305.

Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The modern language journal, 81(4), 482-493.

Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eaglin, R. G. (1973). The effect of verbal reinforcement on leader behavior. Journal of College Student Personnel.

Gerard, H. B., & Miller, N. (1967). Group dynamics. Annual review of psychology, 18(1), 287-332.

Howard, D. J. (1993). Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, 46-69.

Howard, D. J. (1993). Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, 46-69.

Jia, D., Guo, H., Song, Z., Shi, L., Deng, X., Perc, M., & Wang, Z. (2021). Local and global stimuli in reinforcement learning. New Journal of Physics, 23(8), 083020.

Lestari, L., & Izzaty, R. E. (2020). The effectiveness of reinforcement sensitivity theory on student motivation through group counseling services. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling: Jurnal Kajian Psikologi Pendidikan dan Bimbingan Konseling, 6(1), 29-34.

Levi, D., & Askay, D. A. (2020). Group dynamics for teams. Sage Publications.

Lewin, K. (2016). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method, and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human relations.

Liberman, R. (1970). A behavioral approach to group dynamics: I. Reinforcement and prompting of cohesiveness in group therapy. Behavior Therapy, 1(2), 141-175.

Liberman, R. (1970). A behavioral approach to group dynamics: II. Reinforcing and prompting hostility-to-the-therapist in group therapy. Behavior Therapy, 1(3), 312-327.

Liberman, R. (1971). Reinforcement of cohesiveness in group therapy: Behavioral and personality changes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 25(2), 168-177.

Lucas, C., & Kline, T. (2008). Understanding the influence of organizational culture and group dynamics on organizational change and learning. The learning organization.

Mascarenhas, B. (1989). Strategic group dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 333-352.

McKee, K. R., Hughes, E., Zhu, T. O., Chadwick, M. J., Koster, R., Castaneda, A. G., … & Leibo, J. Z. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning models the emergent dynamics of human cooperation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04982.

Nisa, K., Wibowo, M. E., & Awalya, A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Behavioral Group Counseling with Self-Management and Reinforcement Techniques to Reduce Students’ Truancy. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 9(1), 13-17.

Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(1), 107.

Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., & Lantz, P. (2003). Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(3), 249-262.

Seal, D. W., Bogart, L. M., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1998). Small group dynamics: The utility of focus group discussions as a research method. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(4), 253.

Sert, E., Bar-Yam, Y., & Morales, A. J. (2020). Segregation dynamics with reinforcement learning and agent-based modeling. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-12.

Sun, J., Qi, G., Mazur, N., & Zhu, Z. (2021). Structural scheduling of transient control under energy storage systems by sparse-promoting reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(2), 744-756.

Zhou, Z., & Xu, H. (2022). Decentralized optimal large scale multi-player pursuit-evasion strategies: A mean field game approach with reinforcement learning. Neurocomputing, 484, 46-58.

Download Sample Pages

 

How to cite this Book: 

APA:
Vaithyanathan, R. K.(2021). Reinforcement Strategies in Group Dynamics (1st ed., pp. 1-160). Jupiter Publications consortium,ISBN: 978-93-91303-29-7, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47715/JPC.B.80.2022.9789391303297